Legal Opinion
City of Covington v. Cincinnati
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
Decided February 13, 1934No. 6466PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MOORMAN, Circuit Judge.
This is an appeal from an order of the District Court for the Eastern District of Kentucky granting a preliminary injunction enjoining certain Northern Kentucky cities from interfering with the Cincinnati, Newport & Covington Railway Company in charging a 10-eent eash or a 7%-cent token fare for a single ride on its lines from the Kentucky cities to the northern terminus of the railway company in Cincinnati, Ohio. The appellant cities, while a part of the metropolitan area of Cincinnati, are separated from that city by the Ohio river. They are themselves divided by the…
2Cases cited37 opinions
- Louisville & Nashville Railroad v. MottleySupreme Court of the United States · 1911
- Arizona Grocery Co. v. Atchison, Topeka & Santa Fe Railway Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1932
- Buck v. KuykendallSupreme Court of the United States · 1925
- Public Utilities Commission v. Attleboro Steam & Electric Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1927
- Detroit v. Detroit Citizens' Street Railway Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1902
32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Securities & Exchange Commission v. Sunbeam Gold Mines Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1938
- Sparks v. Mellwood DairyCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1934
- Cincinnati v. City of CincinnatiCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1934
- Cincinnati, Newport & Covington Railway Co. v. City of Cincinnati, OhioCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1937