Legal Opinion · Dissent

Raymer v. Willis

Court of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976)

Decided October 20, 1931Published

1Dissent

Opinion by

Judge Richardson,

Dissenting.

It is with extreme diffidence that I register my dissent to the opinion of my associates in this case. But my views of the section of the statute herein involved, and its proper construction, impel me to protest against the language used and. the conclusions reached by them. The opinion breaks down every barrier provided by law against the perpetration of fraud in election. It not only emasculates, but in effect annihilates, the statute. The purpose of the statute was to make assured, protect, and safeguard the integrity of the ballot box. The reasons for…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. People ex rel. Williams v. CicottMichigan Supreme Court · 1868
  2. Hudson v. SolomonSupreme Court of Kansas · 1877
  3. Edwards v. LoganCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1902
  4. Marilla v. RattermanCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1925
  5. Muncy v. DuffCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1922

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API