Legal Opinion

State Ex Rel. Henning v. Gundvaldson

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided December 10, 1926No. 25,904PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDibell, J.

Habeas corpus on the relation of Mrs. George C. Henning to determine the custody of her infant daughter now in the custody of the defendants Elmer Gundvaldson and Luvena Gundvaldson, husband and wife, the latter a sister of Mrs. Henning.

Upon the hearing before the court commissioner of Pipestone county custody was awarded to the relator. The writ is before us on appeal and the appeal is a trial de novo. It is submitted upon the evidence taken below and additional evidence taken since the decision of the commissioner.

The natural right of the parent to the custody of his child is recognized and…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. State ex rel. Platzer v. BeardsleySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1921
  2. State ex rel. Anderson v. AndersonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1903
  3. State ex rel. Larson v. HalversonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1914
  4. State Ex Rel. Fossen v. HitmanSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1925
  5. State ex rel. Machgan v. PelowskiSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1920

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. State Ex Rel. Feeley v. WilliamsSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1929
  2. Molto v. MoltoSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1954
  3. State Ex Rel. Olson v. SorensonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1940
  4. State Ex Rel. Rys v. VorlicekSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1949
  5. State Ex Rel. Herniman v. MarksonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1932

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API