Legal Opinion

C. C. King Co. v. Aldrich

Supreme Court of New Hampshire

Decided April 3, 1923PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtYoung, J.

The plaintiffs, who were the proprietors of a meat market, agreed to buy “two good large hogs” of the defendant, intending, as he knew, to sell them for food. After the plaintiffs had paid for the hogs, they discovered that they were diseased and could not bo sold. Laws 1907, c. 48, s. 3, par. 7. Neither of the parties, however, either knew or were in fault for not knowing that fact. It can serve no useful purpose to consider the distinction between an executed and an executory contract, for in the view we take of the facts the minds of the parties never met in respect to the subject-matter…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Sherwood v. WalkerMichigan Supreme Court · 1887
  2. Thwing v. Hall & Ducey Lumber Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1889

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Robert G. Watkins & Son, Inc. v. CarrigSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1941

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API