Legal Opinion

Schenectady Chemicals, Inc. v. Imitec, Inc.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided January 24, 1991Published

1Opinion of the CourtWeiss, J.

Appeal from an order of the Supreme Court (Doran, J.), entered February 15, 1990 in Schenectady County, which denied plaintiff’s motion for reconsideration.

The underlying facts on this appeal are fully set forth in the parties’ two prior discovery appeals (see, 133 AD2d 920, 151 AD2d 804). Plaintiff sought to have defendants held in contempt of court and defendants cross-moved for the imposition of severe sanctions upon plaintiff resulting from continuing disputes over discovery procedures. Supreme Court concluded that supervised disclosure was the only practical solution (CPLR 3104). On…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Schenectady Chemicals, Inc. v. Imitec, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1987
  2. Schenectady Chemicals, Inc. v. Imitec, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1989

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API