Legal Opinion

Paul v. City of Swartz Creek

Michigan Court of Appeals

Decided April 21, 1971No. Docket No. 8222PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtQuinn, P. J.

Defendants appeal from judgments entered on jury verdicts in favor of the individual plaintiffs. The theory of plaintiffs’ action was that the negligence of defendants caused the sanitary sewer system of defendant city to back up and flood their basements which resulted in personal injury and property damage to each plaintiff.

Plaintiffs gave defendant city timely written notice of their intent to hold the city liable for their damages, as required by the city charter. However, plaintiffs’ bill of particulars and amended bill of particulars listed items of damage not specified in the written…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Meredith v. City of MelvindaleMichigan Supreme Court · 1969
  2. Ridgeway v. City of EscanabaMichigan Supreme Court · 1908
  3. Beardsley v. R. J. Manning Co.Michigan Court of Appeals · 1966
  4. Overton v. City of DetroitMichigan Supreme Court · 1954
  5. Watson v. DaxMichigan Supreme Court · 1952

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Himes v. City of FlintMichigan Court of Appeals · 1972

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API