Legal Opinion

Commonwealth v. Forster

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided April 13, 1978No. 910PublishedCited by 23 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

PRICE, Judge:

This is an appeal from a conviction of possession of a controlled substance.1 Appellant’s sole claim is that the facts alleged in the warrant affidavit were insufficient to constitute probable cause for the issuance of a search warrant. We agree with the issuing magistrate and the lower court that probable cause was shown, and we therefore affirm the judgment of sentence.

On April 17, 1975, pursuant to a warrant, local police entered and searched appellant’s room in a college dormitory. The search garnered 69.0 grams of marijuana, and on the basis of this evidence appellant was…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Aguilar v. TexasSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
  2. Spinelli v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
  3. Jones v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1960
  4. Beck v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
  5. United States v. VentrescaSupreme Court of the United States · 1965

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by23 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. DavisSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1991
  2. Commonwealth v. MazzochettiSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1982
  3. Commonwealth v. ProkopchakSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1980
  4. Commonwealth v. GannonSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1982
  5. Commonwealth v. ProsdocimoSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1982

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API