Legal Opinion

McAllister v. Barnes

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided April 16, 1889PublishedCited by 2 opinions

Appeal from the Scotland Circuit Court. — Hon. B. E. Turner, Judge. The court erred in excluding evidence tending to prove custom and usage of merchants of Memphis, Missouri, and members of the firm of T. S. Wise & Co. Cayton v. Harding, 27 Mo. 536 ; Edgell r. Manqueen, 8 Mo. App. 71; Roble v. Metcalf, 20 Mo. App. 361; Ackley v. Stochlin, 56 Mo. 558 ; Thompson v. Riggs, 5 Wall. 679; Renner ¶. Bank, 9 Wheat. 582 ; Cadwell v. Scott, 54 N. H. ; Ins. v. Bennett, 13 Am.

Read the full summary

Appeal from the Scotland Circuit Court. — Hon. B. E. Turner, Judge. The court erred in excluding evidence tending to prove custom and usage of merchants of Memphis, Missouri, and members of the firm of T. S. Wise & Co. Cayton v. Harding, 27 Mo. 536 ; Edgell r. Manqueen, 8 Mo. App. 71; Roble v. Metcalf, 20 Mo. App. 361; Ackley v. Stochlin, 56 Mo. 558 ; Thompson v. Riggs, 5 Wall. 679; Renner ¶. Bank, 9 Wheat. 582 ; Cadwell v. Scott, 54 N. H. ; Ins. v. Bennett, 13 Am. Dec. 109-118; Canseroort v. Williams, 14 Wend. 139 ; Lawson on Usages and Customs, 121, 122, 180; Id. 485, sec. 248; Waterman on…

1Opinion of the CourtRombauer, P. J.

This is a suit upon an account for goods sold and delivered. The plaintiffs are assignees of the account, which the defendant originally contracted with T. S. *671Wise & Co., a firm of retail grocers in Memphis, Missouri, consisting of T. S. Wise, James Penny and Abram Wise, and one Dud Webber as silent partner. The defense interposed was payment.

Upon the trial of the cause before a jury, the plaintiffs recovered judgment and the errors assigned by the defendant appealing ar e that the court excluded proper evidence offered by him, gave erroneous instructions offered by the plaintiffs, and…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Williams' Admr. v. WilliamsSupreme Court of Missouri · 1878
  2. Crawshaw v. SumnerSupreme Court of Missouri · 1874
  3. Desberger v. HarringtonMissouri Court of Appeals · 1888
  4. Forney v. AdamsSupreme Court of Missouri · 1881
  5. Tuttle v. HoagSupreme Court of Missouri · 1870

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Roberts v. WilsonMissouri Court of Appeals · 1930
  2. Barrie v. St. Louis Transit Co.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1906

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API