Legal Opinion

Cleveland v. State

Court of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma

Decided December 9, 2011No. 107,367PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

LARRY JOPLIN, Judge.

11 Appellants, Christopher and Huyen Cleveland (parents/father/mother), appeal the trial court's June 26, 2009 orders terminating their parental rights pursuant to 10 0.$.2001 § 7006-1.1(A)(6), which determined HT. was a deprived child due to the parents' failure to correct the conditions which led to the termination of their parental rights to H.T.'s four oldest siblings.1

1 2 Mother asserts the verdiet which found H.T. deprived and terminated the parental rights of both parents is not supported by sufficient evidence; the court erred in failing to sustain Mother's motion…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Barber v. PageSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
  2. Kiddie v. KiddieSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1977
  3. Lafevers v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1991
  4. RJB Gas Pipeline Co. v. Colorado Interstate Gas Co.Court of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · 1991
  5. Kaneshiro v. BelisarioHawaii Supreme Court · 1970

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. In Re HtCourt of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · 2012

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API