Legal Opinion

Harrison v. Doe, on the Demise of Rapp

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided November 6, 1826PublishedCited by 16 opinions

ERROR to the Knox Circuit Court.—Ejectment by Doe on the demise of Rapp against Harrison, Badollet, and Buntin, for a house and lot in Vincennes. Plea, not guilty. Verdict and judgment for the plaintiff below.

1Opinion of the CourtScott, J.

On two judgments obtained by Frederick Rapp against the bank of Vincennes in June, 1822, executions of fi. fa. were issued and levied on the premises in controversy. After tbe return of those executions, writs of venditioni exponas were issued, and on the 20tb of September, 1823, the property was sold, and Rapp became the purchaser for the sum of 565 dollars, and received the sheriff’s deed. By the statute in force at the time of this sale, it was provided that where the judg*2ment had not been replevied, no real property should be sold, on execution, for less than one-half of its real value.…

Also in this document: Per curiam.

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Simonds v. CatlinNew York Supreme Court · 1804
  2. Hayden v. DunlapCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1813

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Capital Bank v. HuntoonSupreme Court of Kansas · 1886
  2. Tyler v. WilkersonIndiana Supreme Court · 1867
  3. Boos v. MorganIndiana Supreme Court · 1892
  4. Branch v. FoustIndiana Supreme Court · 1892
  5. Cavender v. Heirs of SmithSupreme Court of Iowa · 1855

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API