Borough of Glassboro v. Fraternal Order of Police, Lodge No. 108
Supreme Court of New Jersey
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Long
In 2004, the Borough of Glassboro Police Department (Borough) announced an opening for the position of lieutenant. Three candidates applied, including Sergeants Peter Amico and William Highley. As a non-civil service municipality, the Borough is not subject to the statutory requirements of a “comprehensive promotional procedure.” Rather, state law requires only that “[d]ue consideration shall be given to the member or officer so proposed for the promotion, to the length and merit of his service and preference shall be given according to seniority in service.” N.J.S.A. 40A: 14-129.
The Borough…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- DiProspero v. PennSupreme Court of New Jersey · 2005
- O'CONNELL v. StateSupreme Court of New Jersey · 2002
- Bergen Commercial Bank v. SislerSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1999
- Kearny PBA Local 21 v. Town of KearnySupreme Court of New Jersey · 1979
- New Jersey Turnpike Authority v. Local 196, I.F.P.T.E.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 2007
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- The Pitney Bowes Bank, Inc. v. Abc Caging FulfillmentNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 2015
- In re the City of CamdenNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 2013
- Borough of East Rutherford v. East Rutherford PBA Local 275Supreme Court of New Jersey · 2013
- CHARLENE UHRMANN, ETC. VS. COLLEN LABOW (L-0706-19, MORRIS COUNTY AND STATEWIDE)New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 2020
- CHARLENE UHRMANN, ETC. VS. COLLEN LABOW (L-0706-19, MORRIS COUNTY AND STATEWIDE)New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 2020
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.