Legal Opinion

Foreman v. Griffith

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit

Decided November 17, 2003No. 02-2284UnpublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

2Per curiam

Andre Foreman (Foreman) appeals the district court's dismissal of his § 1983 claims alleging deprivation of liberty and property interests without due process of law in violation of the Due Process Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment to the United States Constitution. U.S. Const, amend. XIV; 42 U.S.C. § 1983. He also appeals the district court’s dismissal of his state law defamation claim. We affirm in part, vacate in part, and remand for further proceedings.

I

Foreman is a deputy attorney for the City of Norfolk, Virginia (the City). He filed the present action after he was demoted to a…

3Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Board of Regents of State Colleges v. RothSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  2. Pennhurst State School and Hospital v. HaldermanSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  3. New York Times Co. v. SullivanSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
  4. Edelman v. JordanSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
  5. Perry v. SindermannSupreme Court of the United States · 1972

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

4Cited by9 opinions

  1. Charles v. Front Royal Volunteer Fire & Rescue Department, Inc.District Court, W.D. Virginia · 2014
  2. Foreman v. GriffithSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
  3. Franks v. ColemanDistrict Court, E.D. North Carolina · 2021
  4. Grant v. Southside Regional JailDistrict Court, E.D. Virginia · 2019
  5. McClain v. BakerDistrict Court, D. South Carolina · 2025

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API