Legal Opinion

In re P.H.M.T.

Supreme Court of Georgia

Decided January 24, 2000No. S00A0716PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Per curiam

In this case, the Board to Determine Fitness of Bar Applicants (the “Board”) initially granted the applicant, P.H.M.T., a temporary certification of fitness to practice law. The Board, however, subsequently rescinded its temporary certification, and entered a tentative order denying P.H.M.T.’s application for certification of fitness.1 Pursuant to Part A, Section 8 (a) of the Rules Governing Admission to the Practice of Law, P.H.M.T. requested a formal hearing on his application for certification. After the hearing, the hearing officer recommended that P.H.M.T. not be certified to practice…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. In Re BeasleySupreme Court of Georgia · 1979
  2. In re C. R. W.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1997
  3. In re E. L. D.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1998

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. In re FinnMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2001
  2. In re HuddlestonSupreme Court of Georgia · 2015
  3. in the Matter of Jonathan Richard HuddlestonSupreme Court of Georgia · 2015

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API