Legal Opinion

Oceanographic Commission v. O'Brien

Washington Supreme Court

Decided November 21, 1968No. 39914PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHamilton, J.

This is an original mandamus proceeding. Plaintiffs seek to compel defendants, the State Treasurer and the Budget Director, to honor certain vouchers, and to execute, issue and honor warrants thereon in payment of expenses incurred by six members of the Oceanographic Commission of Washington. The defendants’ refusal to make these payments is based upon the fact that these six members of the commission were also members of the fortieth (1967) state legislature which created the commission *906through enactment of Laws of 1967, ch. 243. Because of this fact, defendants contend the respective…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. State Ex Rel. Barney v. HawkinsMontana Supreme Court · 1927
  2. Clark v. DwyerWashington Supreme Court · 1960
  3. State Ex Rel. Herbert v. FergusonOhio Supreme Court · 1944
  4. State Ex Rel. O'Connell v. DubuqueWashington Supreme Court · 1966
  5. People Ex Rel. Board of Trustees v. BarrettIllinois Supreme Court · 1943

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Miller v. City of TacomaWashington Supreme Court · 1999
  2. Anderson v. ChapmanWashington Supreme Court · 1975
  3. Warwick v. State Ex Rel. ChanceAlaska Supreme Court · 1976
  4. Hsieh v. Civil Service Commission of SeattleWashington Supreme Court · 1971
  5. State Ex Rel. Rist v. UnderwoodWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1999

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API