Legal Opinion

United States v. Pullarao Pentapati

Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit

Decided September 5, 1973No. 73-1779PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Per curiam

Defendant appeals from his conviction on a two count indictment charging him with knowingly and intentionally (1) importing sixty-six grams of cocaine into the United States in violation of 21 U.S.C. § 952(a), and (2) possessing that controlled narcotic with intent to distribute, in violation of 21 U.S.C. § 841 (a)(1). Defendant argues that, as a purely foreign trafficker in narcotics, he is outside the intended ambit of these provisions of the federal narcotic control laws. Finding that the facts of this case do not support defendant’s elaborate legal construction, we affirm.

This case was…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Manfred Daut v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1969
  2. United States v. Joseph Morello and Rosario FarullaCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1957
  3. Homero Sanchez Pineda v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1968

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. United States v. Fernando MirandaCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1979
  2. United States v. Folonsho Samuel OjebodeCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1992
  3. United States v. Michael Muench, Michelle Lewis and Albert ForemanCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1982
  4. United States v. Ralph McKenzieCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1987
  5. United States v. Carlos A. CatanoCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1977

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API