People v. Etcheverry
New York Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
Memorandum. The order appealed from should be affirmed. Sections 65.00 and 65.15 of the Penal Law where they speak of the imposition of a sentence by a "court of this state”, are to be read literally. This is so especially because of the different penal systems resulting from the separate State and national sovereignties under our Federal system of Government (Bartkus v Illinois, 359 US 121; Abbate v United States, 359 US 187). It follows that the benefits appellant now seeks under those sections are not available in his case since the "other offense” imposed upon him was by a Federal court…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Bartkus v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1959
- Abbate v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1959
- People v. SchatzAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1974
3Cited by1 opinion
- Peterson v. New York State Department of Correctional ServicesAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1984