Legal Opinion
Allder v. Daniel O'Connell's Sons
District Court, D. Massachusetts
Decided September 11, 1998No. CIV. A. 96-30250-MAPPublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
PONSOR, District Judge.
There being no objection, this Report and Recommendation is hereby adopted, and defendant’s motion for summary judgment is DENIED.
REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION REGARDING DEFENDANT’S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT (Docket No. 19)
NEIMAN, United States Magistrate Judge.
Morris Allder (“Plaintiff”) claims to have been subject to unlawful disparate treatment by his employer, Daniel O’Connell’s Sons (“Defendant”). Specifically, Plaintiff alleges that Defendant subjected him to ongoing discrimination as evidenced, at least in part, by racial slurs and an alleged policy of not pro…
2Cases cited40 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. GreenSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Thomas v. ArnSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Texas Department of Community Affairs v. BurdineSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
- United States Postal Service Board of Governors v. AikensSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
35 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Sisco v. DLA Piper LLPDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 2011
- Gore v. Trustees of Deerfield AcademyDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 2005
- Robb v. PerdueDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2025
- Semmami v. UG2 LLCDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 2019