Legal Opinion

Hutchison v. Crutcher

Tennessee Supreme Court

Decided February 17, 1897PublishedCited by 3 opinions

FROM DAVIDSON. Appeal from Chancery Court of Davidson County. Thos. H. Malone, Ch.

1Opinion of the CourtBeard, J.

The complainant in this cause seeks a personal decree against the defendant as the in-dorser of a protested promissory note, and also to have it fixed as a lien on certain real estate described in the bill. This note, of which complainant is the owner, was executed by one Smith in 1892 to the order of the defendant, Crutcher, and *423was made payable on May 31, 1896, at the Commercial National Bank, a banking institution then in successful operation in the city of Nashville. Before its maturity the Commercial National Bank was found to be insolvent, and, acting under the authority of law, the…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. National Bank v. Insurance Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1881
  2. Chemical National Bank v. Hartford Deposit Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1896
  3. Rosenblatt v. JohnstonSupreme Court of the United States · 1882
  4. Spann v. BaltzellSupreme Court of Florida · 1847
  5. Roberts v. MasonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1840

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. American National Bank v. DewSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1917
  2. Harrison v. BealsOregon Supreme Court · 1924
  3. Jackson v. McInnisOregon Supreme Court · 1898

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API