Legal Opinion

Laizure v. Baker

Supreme Court of Colorado

Decided September 12, 1932No. 13,147PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Burke

Plaintiee in. error is hereinafter referred to as Laizure, and defendants in error as Judge Baker and Mrs. Laizure respectively.

Laizure brought mandamus to Compel Judge Baker to enter or sign a final decree of divorce or a certificate that Mr. and Mrs. Laizure were divorced. The alternative writ was issued and answers thereto', including demurrers, filed. Judge Baker’s demurrer was sustained, Laizure elected to stand, and to review the judgment of dismissal thereupon entered' against him he prosecutes this writ.

Laizure originally sought mandamus directly in this court and his action was…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Walton v. WaltonSupreme Court of Colorado · 1929
  2. Lindsey v. CarltonSupreme Court of Colorado · 1908
  3. Laizure v. BakerSupreme Court of Colorado · 1932

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Brownlow v. WunchSupreme Court of Colorado · 1938
  2. Tyler v. School District No. 1Supreme Court of Colorado · 1972
  3. Tyler v. SCHOOL DISTRICT NO. I, CITY AND COUNTY OF DENVERSupreme Court of Colorado · 1972
  4. Tyler v. School District No. 1Supreme Court of Colorado · 1972

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API