Legal Opinion · Concurring in part, dissenting in part

Juvenal Ex Rel. Juvenal v. Okeene Public Schools

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided July 12, 1994No. 75577Published

1Concurring in part, dissenting in partSummers, Justice

In a trial where the injured plaintiff will win or lose depending on whether the jury finds her injuries were due to the alleged negligence of the defendant, the trial court must give the jury some basic instructions on the law of negligence. Because no such instructions were given here I would reverse the judgment for the Okeene Public Schools and Okeene Public Works Authority, and remand for a new trial.

The instructions not given to the jury appear in the Oklahoma Uniform Jury Instructions booklet as numbers 9.1 and 9.2, and are as follows:

*1034NEGLIGENCE — ELEMENTS OF LIABILITY

A party claiming…

2Cases cited40 opinions

  1. Timmons v. Royal Globe Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1982
  2. Messler v. Simmons Gun Specialties, Inc.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1984
  3. Smicklas v. SpitzSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1992
  4. Sutherland v. Saint Francis Hospital, Inc.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1979
  5. Crosby v. Savannah Electric & Power Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1966

35 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API