Legal Opinion

Brainard Investment Co. v. F.H.L. Corp.

Ohio Court of Appeals

Decided October 5, 1936PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

By CARPENTER, J.

In the trial court in an action for fraud and deceit, plaintiff, The Brainard Investment Company, Limited, obtained a judgment against the defendant, F. H. L. Corporation, for $33,635.74. That defendant duly appealed to this court on questions of law, but gave no supersedeas bond. Execution was issued and returned “not satisfied,” whereupon proceedings in aid were begun and as a result thereof the sheriff, Roy S. Hardman, was appointed receiver and ordered to inventory and hold all of the'property of the judgment debtor “until further order of this court.”

Lately the…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Boone v. StateOhio Supreme Court · 1923

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Jarboe v. Workingmen's Overall Supply Co.Ohio Court of Appeals · 1938
  2. Ohio Farmers Co-Op. Milk Assn. v. DavisOhio Court of Appeals · 1937
  3. Stevely v. StollOhio Court of Appeals · 1937
  4. Eubank v. Industrial CommissionOhio Court of Appeals · 1937

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API