Legal Opinion · Dissent

Claim of Bletter v. Harcourt, Brace & World, Inc.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided May 21, 1968Published

1DissentReynolds, J.

The claimant’s fall while executing a dance step was purely personal act of the claimant and not in anyway attributable to the employment environment and thus the rationale of Matter of Kaplan v. Zodiac Watch Co. (20 N Y 2d 537) precludes an award here. I cannot agree with the majority’s position that the “personal act” concept is limited to “such matters as dressing, personal hygiene or personal comfort”. Moreover, as I interpret Kaplan it is highly significant whether the accident is some how “ work connected ” or “ could ' have as easily occured at his home or at any other place.” (Matter…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Claim of Ingraham v. Lane Construction Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1955
  2. Claim of Ingraham v. Lane Construction Corp.New York Court of Appeals · 1955

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API