Ryce v. Ryce
Indiana Supreme Court
From the Vigo Common Pleas.
1Opinion of the CourtDowney, J.
On the 12th day of May, 1871, the parties to this proceeding were divorced, on the ground that the appellee had failed to provide for his family. . Until the further .order of the court, the custody and guardianship of Lucius C. Ryce, the child of the parties, then about five years of age, were given to the appellant, and she was charged with his support. It was also ordered that the appellee should have the right, at all proper and reasonable times, to see and converse with the child; that, for this purpose, the appellanf should permit the child to visit or be taken to the residence of his…
2Cited by4 opinions
- Stonehill v. StonehillIndiana Supreme Court · 1896
- Conn v. ConnIndiana Supreme Court · 1877
- Dixon v. DixonNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1907
- Rogers v. RogersOhio Supreme Court · 1894