Legal Opinion
Berroteran v. Quirk and Tratos
District Court, D. Nevada
Decided March 20, 2023No. 2:21-cv-00396Unknown
1Opinion
1 2 3 4 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 5 DISTRICT OF NEVADA 6 * * * 7 ABELARDO BERROTERAN, Case No. 2:21-cv-00396-RFB-EJY 8 Plaintiff, ORDER 9 v. 10 QUIRK AND TRATOS et al., 11 12 Defendants. 13 Before the Court is one motion: Defendant Microsoft (“Microsoft”)’s Motion to Dismiss. 14 ECF No. 25. For the reasons stated below, the Court grants the Motion. 15 I. Procedural History 16 Plaintiff commenced this pro se patent infringement case by applying to proceed in forma 17 pauperis (IFP) along with the case initiating documents on March 9, 2021. ECF No. 1. On March 18 11, 2021, The Court ordered…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Douglas Leite v. Crane CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2014
- Astoria Federal Savings & Loan Ass'n v. SoliminoSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
- Henry G. Mack v. South Bay Beer Distributors, Inc., Dba Bay Beer Distributors, a California CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1986
- In Re Dynamic Random Access Memory (Dram)Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2008
- Propat International Corp. v. RPost, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2007
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.