Legal Opinion

McCarroll, Comm. of Rev. v. Scott Paper Box Co.

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided April 18, 1938No. 4-5116PublishedCited by 19 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtG-rifein Smith, C. J.

The question to be determined is whether appellee, Scott Paper Box Company, must collect and pay the Arkansas retail sales tax on pasteboard boxes it manufactures and sells to the Wortz Biscuit Company.

The case was tried on an agreed statement of facts, the material provisions of which are:

“The biscuit company,. in the manufacture of its packaged articles, uses the paper boxes as a component part of the article and resells the same in unchanged form to the wholesaler, jobber, or retailer, who in turn sells the package in unchanged form to the ultimate consumer.
“The biscuit company sells said…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Wiseman v. Arkansas Wholesale Grocers' Ass'nSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1936

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. Gay v. Canada Dry Bottling Co. of FloridaSupreme Court of Florida · 1952
  2. Arkansas Beverage Company v. HeathSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1975
  3. Goebel Brewing Co. v. State Board of Tax AdministrationMichigan Supreme Court · 1943
  4. Birmingham Paper Co. v. CurrySupreme Court of Alabama · 1939
  5. Hervey v. Southern Wooden Box, Inc.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1972

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API