Legal Opinion
United States v. Angelo Bartemio
Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit
Decided May 30, 1974No. 73-1611 to 73-1613PublishedCited by 15 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
GRANT, Senior District Judge.
The defendants, John Joseph Brennan and Roger Drain, were charged with possession of approximately one hundred and eighty-nine (189) Oklahoma City Housing Authority Bonds, stolen from an interstate shipment, knowing them to be stolen, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 659 (Count II). In the same substantive count, Defendant Angelo Bartemio was charged with aiding and abetting that possession. All defendants were also charged with conspiracy (Count I). The jury found Defendants Brennan and Drain guilty of conspiracy and the substantive offense of possession. As to…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Glasser v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1942
- Nye & Nissen v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1949
- United States v. Joseph Alfred TannerCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1972
- United States v. Marcia Lyon and Anton LysczykCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1968
- Arland L. Gerberding v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1973
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- United States v. Harry Aleman and Leonard ForestaCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1979
- United States v. Debbe MarquardtCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1986
- United States v. Charles Lee Douglass and James Andrew BabbCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1986
- United States v. Mark A. PattersonCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1994
- United States v. Raymond Derosa, Alfred Ponticelli, Danny Desantis, Phil BertmanCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1982
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.