Legal Opinion

Thompson v. Employment Division

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided May 11, 1994No. 93-AB-824; CA A79923PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtDe Muniz, J.

In this unemployment compensation case, employer (petitioner) seeks review of an Employment Appeals Board (EAB) order allowing claimant to include per diem meal allowances as income in claimant’s base year.1 We review for errors of law, ORS 657.282; ORS 183.482(8), and reverse.

EAB found, in part:

“(2) [Claimant’s] base year, for determining weeks of work and receipt of wages, was the period of April 1,1990 through March, 1991. (3) During that time, claimant drove a truck owned by the named employer * * *.
“* * * (5) [C]laimant was paid $600 or $800 by [employer], plus a meals per diem of $26 to…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Harsh Investment Corp. v. State Ex Rel. State Housing DivisionCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1987
  2. Jones v. Employment DivisionCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1977

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. State v. MihmCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1998

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API