Surry v. Surry
Washington Supreme Court
Appeal from an order of the superior court for King county, Humphries, J., entered May 23, 1914, in favor of the plaintiff, on the pleadings, in an action on a supersedeas bond.
1Opinion of the CourtChadwick, J.
This action was brought to recover on a supersedeas bond. The principal parties are not strangers to this court. State ex rel. Surry v. Superior Court, 74 Wash. 689, 134 Pac. 178; Surry v. Surry, 78 Wash. 370, 139 Pac. 44. We shall speak of them as appellant and respondent.
On June 14, 1913, the court below entered an order requiring appellant to pay alimony at the rate of ten dollars a week, and twenty-five dollars attorney’s fees to be paid on July 1, 1913, and twenty-five dollars to be paid on August 1, 1913.
Appellant not having met the order of the court in any way, was cited under a rule…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Fite v. BlackSupreme Court of Georgia · 1890
- State ex rel. Surry v. Superior CourtWashington Supreme Court · 1913
- State ex rel. Schloss v. Superior CourtWashington Supreme Court · 1892
- Surry v. SurryWashington Supreme Court · 1914
- State ex rel. McDonald v. Superior CourtWashington Supreme Court · 1893
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Matter of Marriage of BralleyCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1993
- Retail Store Employees Union, Local 1001 v. Washington Surveying & Rating BureauWashington Supreme Court · 1976
- Retail Store Employees Union, Local 1001 v. Washington Surveying & Rating BureauWashington Supreme Court · 1976