In re Creed

After Remand

Before: Danhof, C.J., and V. J. Brennan and N. A. Baguley,* JJ. Per Curiam.

The facts of this case are discussed in our previous opinion, In the Matter of Creed, 126 Mich App 32; 337 NW2d 41 (1983), and will not be repeated here. The previous appeal was remanded to the probate court for a hearing to enable the probate judge to determine whether petitioners had met the good cause requirement of MCL 710.67; MSA 27.3178(555.67).

*712Upon remand, the probate judge held a hearing and determined that petitioners had shown good cause. Petitioners were allowed to examine the adoption records of…