Legal Opinion

Anderson v. Phegley

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided September 25, 1917Published

From Josephine: Frank M. Calkins, Judge. Originally this was a suit by T. E. Anderson, T. K. Anderson, as administrator of the estate of H. A. Williamson, deceased, substituted for said deceased, and Albert Phillips, against Grant Phegley and Emma G. Eobinson. From an order denying the motion of Emma G. Eobinson to set aside the decree and allow an answer to be filed, she appeals. Submitted on brief under the proviso of Supreme Court Eule 18: 56 Or. 622 (117 Pac. xi).

1Opinion of the Court 1

In Banc.

2Opinion of the Court · BeanJustice Bean

1. This is an appeal by defendant, Emma G. Eobinson, from an order denying a motion to vacate a decree entered in conformity with the mandate of this court issued upon rehearing. The original opinion in this case is reported in 71 Or. 331 (142 Pac. 593), and that on rehearing in 74 Or. 388 (145 Pac. 642). At page 398 of the latter opinion this court, speaking by Mr. Justice Harris, said:

‘ ‘ This court has decided the issues presented on the entire record as that record was made by the parties. Every issue raised by the pleadings, every question presented by the record, and every right…

3Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Anderson v. PhegleyOregon Supreme Court · 1915
  2. Anderson v. PhegleyOregon Supreme Court · 1914

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API