Legal Opinion

Zanes v. United States

United States Customs Court

Decided January 29, 1958No. Reap. Dec. 9062; Entry No. 2950-H, etcPublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Wilson, Judge:

The merchandise involved in these appeals consists of a product known as quebracho extract, a tanning material, which was produced in Argentina, shipped to Holland, and subsequently transshipped to the United States. The goods were entered on the basis of their value in Argentina, the country of production, and were appraised on the basis of their value in Holland, the country from which they were immediately imported.

A stipulation was entered into between counsel for the respective parties to the effect that if the court finds that the merchandise is subject to duty on the…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Maier v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1921
  2. United States v. Geo. E. Mallinson Importing Co.United States Customs Court · 1945

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. T. M. Duche & Sons, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1962
  2. Thrifty Equipment Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1963

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API