Legal Opinion

Betancourt v. City of New York

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided June 28, 1993PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

—In an action to recover damages for trespass, in which the plaintiffs seek injunctive relief, the defendant City of New York appeals, as limited by its brief, from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Rutledge, J.), dated April 26, 1991, as granted that branch of the plaintiffs’ motion which was for a preliminary injunction to the extent of directing that the City be enjoined from allowing any water to escape from its property onto the plaintiffs’ property during the pendency of this action.

Order that the order is reversed insofar as appealed from, on the law, with costs…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Kossoff v. Rathgeb-Walsh, Inc.New York Court of Appeals · 1958
  2. County of Orange v. LockeyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1985
  3. Merrill Lynch Realty Associates, Inc. v. BurrAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1988

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Tatzel v. KaplanAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2002
  2. Betesh v. JemalAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1994
  3. Gollomp v. DubbsAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2001
  4. Lawrence Wolf, Inc. v. Kissing Bridge Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2001

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API