Legal Opinion

Wolscheid v. Thome

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided July 11, 1889PublishedCited by 3 opinions

Error to Clinton. (Smith, J.) Assumpsit. Defendant brings error. The facts and points of counsel passed upon by the Court, are stated in the opinion.

1Opinion of the CourtMorse, J.

The plaintiff brought suit in the circuit court for the county of Clinton, as administratrix of her husband, against the defendant, alleging that on or about the twenty-third day of September, 1881, at the township of Westphalia, in said county, the said defendant received from her said husband 60 sheep, under and by virtue of the following written agreement between the parties, to wit:

“ This agreement made and entered into by and between Nicholas Wolscheid, of Portland, Ionia county, Michigan, of the first part, and Nicholas Thome, of Westphalia, Clinton *267county, Michigan, of the second part,…

2Cited by3 opinions

  1. Mulholland v. DEC International Corp.Michigan Supreme Court · 1989
  2. People ex rel. National Sewer-Pipe Co. v. SharpMichigan Supreme Court · 1903
  3. Mulholland v. DEC International Corp.Michigan Supreme Court · 1989

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API