Legal Opinion
Ex Parte: Charles Franklin Stirrup
Supreme Court of Florida
Decided November 17, 1944PublishedCited by 16 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
SEBRING, J.:
This is a habeas corpus proceeding to test the legality of the imprisonment of the petitioner, Charles Franklin Stirrup. The judgment under which sentence was given was based upon an information that Charles Franklin Stirrup, “did unlawfully, knowingly and designedly and by false pretense and with intent to defraud one R. H. Morgan, obtain from said R. H. Morgan the sum of $25.00 lawful money of the United States of America, said pretense and representation being that he, the said Charles Franklin Stirrup owned a truckload of household furniture that was then on a truck in St.…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Brown v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1943
- Ex parte BaileySupreme Court of Florida · 1897
- Lewis v. NelsonSupreme Court of Florida · 1911
- Sellers v. BridgesSupreme Court of Florida · 1943
- Clifton v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1918
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- Gibbs v. MayoSupreme Court of Florida · 1955
- Catanese v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1971
- Adjmi v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1962
- Adjmi v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1963
- US Fidelity & Guaranty Co. v. JD Johnson Co.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1983
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.