Legal Opinion · Concurring in part, dissenting in part

Mounsey v. Ellard

Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court

Decided June 6, 1973Published

1Concurring in part, dissenting in partQuirico, J.

(concurring in part and dissenting in part, with whom Reardon, J., joins). The plaintiff seeks recovery from each of two defendants (presumably husband and wife) for personal injuries sustained by him as a result of the defendants’ alleged negligence, gross negligence, and wilful, reckless or wanton conduct. The sole question before this court is whether the trial judge properly directed verdicts for the defendants on all counts after counsel for the plaintiff stated the following facts in his opening statement. The defendants owned a two year old house which was equipped with gutters to…

2Cases cited25 opinions

  1. Marbury v. MadisonSupreme Court of the United States · 1803
  2. Cohens v. VirginiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1821
  3. Humphrey's v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1935
  4. Massaletti v. FitzroyMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1917
  5. Ralph D. Smith and Thelma Smith v. Arbaugh's Restaurant, Inc., a Body CorporateCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1973

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API