Legal Opinion
Wade v. Johnson & Johnson
District Court, W.D. Oklahoma
Decided October 14, 2014No. Case Nos. CIV-14-691-L, CIV-14-692-L, CIV-14-693-L, CIV-14-694-L, CIV-14-696-L, CIV-14-697-L, CIV-14-698L, CIV-14-699-L, CIV-14-700-L, CIV-14-701-L, CIV-14-702-LPublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
TIM LEONARD, District Judge.
This matter is before the court on the Motions to Remand filed by plaintiffs in each of the above-captioned cases. The defendant Johnson & Johnson has responded, objecting to remand in each case. No reply briefs were filed. Because the motions and responses are substantively identical, the court considers them together in this order.
The factual background section contained in each of the remand motions provides a procedural history of these cases with which the parties are familiar. Briefly stated, the cases involve numerous claims for damages arising from the…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Owen Equipment & Erection Co. v. KrogerSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Gus Poulos and A.G.P. Marketing v. Naas Foods, Incorporated and Ranks, Hovis, McDougall Plc Group (Rhm Holdings U.S.A. Incorporated)Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1992
- Larry Laughlin v. Kmart CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1995
- Marshall Huffman Virginia Newton v. Saul Holdings Limited Partnership, a Maryland Limited PartnershipCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1999
- Martin v. Franklin Capital Corp.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2001
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Armando Garcia v. Delta Air Lines IncDistrict Court, C.D. California · 2020