Legal Opinion

O'Neill v. Delaney

New York Supreme Court

Decided October 5, 1909PublishedCited by 4 opinions

Action by one O’Neill against one Delaney. Form of decision and judgment to be presented in accordance with opinion.

1Opinion of the CourtBischoff, J.

There is no provision in the constitution under which the “branches,” or local associations, of the parent union were organized whereby the funds collected from members of a branch by the officers of that branch were to become the property of the union. On the contrary, every expression of the instrument on the subject of the receipt and payment of moneys indicates that the funds were to remain the property of the local association from whose members they were collected. That a branch is to control its own finances is directly provided by section 3, article 1 of the constitution; death…

2Cited by4 opinions

  1. Brown v. HookCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1947
  2. Low v. HarrisCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1937
  3. Textile Workers Union v. Federal Labor Union No. 21500Supreme Court of Alabama · 1940
  4. Harker v. McKissockNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1950

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API