Kuhn v. Skelley
Superior Court of Pennsylvania
Appeal, No. 3, April TV, 1904, by defendant, from decree of C. P. No. 1, Allegheny Co., Dec. T., 1902, No. 422, on bill in equity in case of C. L. Kuhn v. James M. Skelley. Bill in equity for specific performance. The opinion of the Superior Court states the case. Error assigned was the decree of the court.
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
Beaver, J.,
Whether defendant was a member of the firm of George S. Martin & Company; whether he had knowledge of the agreement between said firm and the plaintiff for the sale of the lots on Lemington square; whether he purchased said lots subject to the plaintiff’s rights therein, and whether there was in the agreement of sale a right of forfeiture capable of enforcement are questions now immaterial.
After defendant received his deed from George S. Martin & Company, he notified plaintiff, under date of May 1, 1895 : “You are hereby notified that the Lemington square property *187has…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Irvin v. BleakleySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1871
- Forsyth v. North American Oil Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1866
- Appeal of HoltSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1881
3Cited by4 opinions
- Dempsey v. StaufferCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1962
- Burchfield v. Alpha Process Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1911
- No. 13868Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1963
- Nos. 13868, 13869Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1963