Legal Opinion · Concurrence

Bannister v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided March 12, 1980No. NN-270/T1-71Published

1ConcurrenceDauksch, Chief Judge

Because this case falls within the holding of State v. Andrews, 376 So.2d 9 (Fla.1979), I must concur. But I am moved to say that the actions of the police, especially but not exclusively those attached to the Drug Enforcement Administration, were quite deplorable and their cruel and overbearing treatment of this Appellant is not unnoticed. Because “two wrongs do not make a right,” I cannot do anything but voice my disgust and let the Appellant’s conviction stand. The impropriety includes the arrest and “unarrest,” telephone calls to Appellant’s wife, holding the Appellant for an inordinate…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. State v. AndrewsSupreme Court of Florida · 1979

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API