Legal Opinion

City of Temple v. Mitchell

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided May 3, 1944No. 9426PublishedCited by 29 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

McClendon, chief justice.

Suit by Mitchell against the City of Temple for damages allegedly resulting from the operation by the City of a sewage disposal plant, located some 2½ miles S. E. of the City and 2,700 feet S. E. of Mitchell’s 30-acre farm home. The plant was alleged to constitute a nuisance in that it produced offensive odors and bred sewer flies which invaded the Mitchell home and rendered living conditions therein intolerable. The damages sought were: As for a permanent nuisance, T) depreciation in value of the farm, and “discomfort, annoyance and inconvenience” 2) to his wife and…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. State v. HaleTexas Supreme Court · 1941
  2. City of Amarillo v. WareTexas Supreme Court · 1931
  3. Rosenthal v. Taylor, Bastrop & Houston Railway Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1891
  4. City of Dallas v. SmithTexas Supreme Court · 1937
  5. City of Lagrange v. PierattTexas Supreme Court · 1943

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by29 opinions

  1. Schneider National Carriers, Inc. v. BatesTexas Supreme Court · 2004
  2. Crosstex North Texas Pipeline, L.P., N/K/A Enlink North Texas Pipeline, Lp v. Andrew Gardiner and Shannon GardinerTexas Supreme Court · 2016
  3. Maranatha Temple, Inc. v. Enterprise Products Company, Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)1995
  4. Loyd v. ECO Resources, Inc., Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston)1997
  5. City of Abilene v. DownsTexas Supreme Court · 1963

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API