Legal Opinion

Wilkus v. Prudential Insurance

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided July 15, 1932Published

1Opinion of the Court

— Judgment and order of the City Court of Yonkers reversed on the law and the facts and a new trial ordered, costs to appellant to abide the event, on the ground that the verdict was against the weight of evidence on the question of a fraudulently obtained compromise, and that it was error on the part of the court to exclude the evidence offered by defendant as to the fraud of the insured in the application for the policy. (Telford v. Metropolitan Life Ins. Co., 223 App. Div. 175, 181; affd., 250 N. Y. 528.) (See, also, Pimpinello v. Swift & Co., 253 N. Y. 159,162.) Lazansky, P. J., Kapper,…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Pimpinello v. Swift & Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1930
  2. Telford v. Metropolitan Life InsuranceAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1928
  3. Telford v. Metropolitan Life Insurance CompanyNew York Court of Appeals · 1928

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API