Legal Opinion

Loeb v. Mann

Supreme Court of South Carolina

Decided September 21, 1893PublishedCited by 12 opinions

Before Izlar, J., Abbeville, January, 1893. Action by Leopold F. Loeb and others, partners as Loeb Bros. & Co., against W. D. Mann. J. S. Loeb, a witness for plaintiffs, was permitted to state that four packages of plaintiffs’ goods were found in defendant’s possession, and were recognized by him as such. Defendant objected to this testimony, insisting that the books of original entry, showing the consignment, were the best evidence, but the objection was overruled.

Read the full summary

Before Izlar, J., Abbeville, January, 1893. Action by Leopold F. Loeb and others, partners as Loeb Bros. & Co., against W. D. Mann. J. S. Loeb, a witness for plaintiffs, was permitted to state that four packages of plaintiffs’ goods were found in defendant’s possession, and were recognized by him as such. Defendant objected to this testimony, insisting that the books of original entry, showing the consignment, were the best evidence, but the objection was overruled. Defendant offered in evidence the mortgage under which the defendant took possession, but it was ruled out, the subscribing…

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Mr. Justice McGowan.

This is an action of “claim and delivery” for certain articles of personal property. It seems that F. C. Perry was a retail liquor dealer in Abbeville; that he failed, having in his store the following articles, viz: two barrels of rye whiskey and two cases of fine brandy, worth in the aggregate $223.60; that these articles had been seized by the defendant Mann as sheriff, in behalf of one claiming to be a mortgage creditor of Perry, and that the articles were covered by his mortgage.

The plaintiffs are liquor dealers of Cincinnati,…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Day v. WoodworthSupreme Court of the United States · 1852
  2. Oelrichs v. SpainSupreme Court of the United States · 1872

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Hackworth v. Greywood at Hammett, LLCCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 2009
  2. Bank of Chillicothe v. McSwainSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1912
  3. Sonneborn v. Southern RailwaySupreme Court of South Carolina · 1903
  4. Robert R. Sizer & Co. v. DopsonSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1911
  5. Tittle v. KennedySupreme Court of South Carolina · 1905

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API