Legal Opinion
Refunding Bd. of Ark. v. National Ref. Co.
Supreme Court of Arkansas
Decided December 23, 1935No. 4-4196PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtSmith, J.
Appellee filed a petition in the Pulaski Circuit Court praying that a writ of mandamus be issued requiring the State Refunding Board to refund its claim against the State Highway Commission. Attached to the complaint were exhibits showing that, pursuant to act No. 11 of the Extraordinary Session of the 1934 General Assembly (Special Acts of 1934, page 28), the claim had been referred to the Highway Audit Commission which on October 6, 1934, had reported to the Refunding Board that “the same is hereby approved and the State Refunding Board is hereby requested to refund the same according to…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Kendall v. United States Ex Rel. StokesSupreme Court of the United States · 1838
- Bates & Guild Co. v. PayneSupreme Court of the United States · 1904
- United States Ex Rel. Riverside Oil Co. v. HitchcockSupreme Court of the United States · 1903
- United States Ex Rel. Ness v. FisherSupreme Court of the United States · 1912
- Jobe v. UrquhartSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1912
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Page v. McKinleySupreme Court of Arkansas · 1938
- Democrat Printing & Lithographing Co. v. ParkerSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1936
- Hardin, Com'r of Revenues v. CassinelliSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1942
- Smith v. Refunding Board of ArkansasSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1936
- Street Improvement District No. 74 v. Refunding BoardSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1936
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.