Legal Opinion

Countryman v. United States

United States Court of Claims

Decided June 7, 1886No. 25PublishedCited by 2 opinions

The Reporters'' statement of the case: The questions of evidence raised in this case and the facts of the case so far, as they are involved are stated in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the CourtDayis, J.

The claimant contracted with one Frost, an Indian ag'ent, to deliver at the, Crow'Indian Agency 150 tons of hay. This he claims to have delivered, and produces a voucher therefor, prepared and signed iu the proper and usual form. The Treasury Department has allowed him but for 80 tons of hay, and the balance of the claim is transmitted to this court for examination under the provisions of the Bowman Act (22 Stat. L., 485). We have already held (McCann’s Case, 18 C. Cls. R., 445) that “ a voucher given by an officer of the Government, in the regular and ordinary course of his busi*475ness, for…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Salomon v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1873
  2. Parish v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1866
  3. McCann v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1883

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Allen v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1893
  2. Globe Works v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1918

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API