Legal Opinion

Mule v. New Jersey Mfrs. Ins. Co.

New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division

Decided January 6, 2003PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

812 A.2d 1128 (2003)

356 N.J. Super. 389

Vincent J. MULE, Plaintiff-Respondent,

v.

NEW JERSEY MANUFACTURERS INSURANCE COMPANY, Defendant-Appellant.

Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.

Argued October 30, 2002.

Decided January 6, 2003.

William F. Hartigan, Jr., Trenton, argued the cause for appellant (McLaughlin & Cooper, attorneys; Mr. Hartigan, of counsel and on the brief).

Scott A. Krasny, West Trenton, argued the cause for defendant (Furlong and Krasny attorneys; Mr. Krasny, on the brief).

Before Judges KING, WECKER and FUENTES.

The opinion of the court was delivered by

FUENTES, J.A.D.

Defe…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Howard v. Harwood's Restaurant Co.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1957
  2. Livingstone v. Abraham & Straus, Inc.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1988
  3. Coleman v. Cycle Transformer Corp.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1986
  4. Zahner v. Pathmark Stores, Inc.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1999
  5. Manole v. CarvellasNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1988

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Milledge v. OaksIndiana Supreme Court · 2003
  2. Eric G. Hanisko v. Billy Casper Golf Management, Inc.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 2014
  3. Acikgoz v. NJ Turnpike AuthorityNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 2008
  4. ARVIND BHUT VS. ALUMINUM SHAPES (DEPARTMENT OF LABOR, DIVISION OF WORKERS' COMPENSATION)New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 2019
  5. BRIAN GRAWEHR VS. TOWNSHIP OF EAST HANOVER(DIVISION OF WORKERS' COMPENSATION)New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 2017

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API