Legal Opinion
State v. Smith
Ohio Court of Appeals
Decided April 16, 2018No. 1–17–50PublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtWillamowski, P.J.
{¶ 1} Defendant-appellant Darian J. Smith ("Smith") appeals the judgment of the Allen County Court of Common Pleas for denying his motion to suppress (1) the contents of a red jacket and (2) a statement he made to the police. For the reasons set forth below, the judgment of the trial court is affirmed.
Facts and Procedural History
{¶ 2} On February 16, 2017, Smith was charged with possession of heroin in violation of R.C. 2925.11(A)(C)(6)(e). Doc. 1. On March 3, 2017, he filed a motion to suppress. Doc. 12. At a suppression hearing on March 16, 2017, Patrolman Ben Thompson ("Thompson")…
2Cases cited28 opinions
- Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Terry v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
- Oregon v. ElstadSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- State v. BurnsideOhio Supreme Court · 2003
- New York v. QuarlesSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- State v. GrantOhio Court of Appeals · 2023
- State v. HarpelOhio Court of Appeals · 2020
- State v. AngersOhio Court of Appeals · 2021
- State v. HaleyOhio Court of Appeals · 2022
- State v. PowellOhio Court of Appeals · 2022
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.