Legal Opinion

Kurz v. Kuhn

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided February 5, 1929PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtRosenberry, J.

We shall dismiss without further consideration the claim made by the defendants that the plaintiff and the defendant Kuhn were engaged in a joint enterprise. That matter is fully discussed in Sommerfield v. Flury, ante, p. 163, 223 N. W. 408, decided herewith. Under the doctrine laid down in that case the relation between Kurz and Kuhn was that of guest and host.

There was a square conflict in the testimony, and a finding by a jury either for or against the plaintiff would have to be sustained. This is not a case where a standard of care has been prescribed either by statute or decision. What…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Sommerfield v. FluryWisconsin Supreme Court · 1929

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Teas v. EisenlordWisconsin Supreme Court · 1934

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API