Legal Opinion

Otoupalik v. Phelps

Supreme Court of Colorado

Decided June 4, 1923No. 10,366PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Campbell

The object of this action is to recover damages for personal injuries actually inflicted upon the plaintiff by the defendant Galland, who drove an automobile upon and into a car which the plaintiff was then driving. The other two defendants, Phelps and Nicholas, were not present at the time, and exercised no control over Galland in driving the car. They are sought to be charged as joint wrongdoers upon the ground that, knowing Galland to be a very careless and reckless driver of automobiles, they permitted him “to drive an automobile which they owned or had in their possession.” Nicholas was…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Potts v. . PardeeNew York Court of Appeals · 1917
  2. Parker v. WilsonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1912
  3. Daily v. MaxwellMissouri Court of Appeals · 1911
  4. Gardiner v. SolomonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1917
  5. Hartley v. MillerMichigan Supreme Court · 1911

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Casebolt ex rel. Casebolt v. CowanSupreme Court of Colorado · 1992
  2. Rounds, Admr. v. PhillipsCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1934
  3. Priestly v. SkourupSupreme Court of Kansas · 1935
  4. Hertz Driv-Ur-Self System, Inc. v. HendricksonSupreme Court of Colorado · 1942
  5. Marron v. HelmeckeSupreme Court of Colorado · 1937

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API