Legal Opinion
Advanced Physicians, S.C. v. Provena Glenwood Medical Imaging
Appellate Court of Illinois
Decided July 5, 2018No. Appeal 3–17–0296UnpublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the CourtJustice McDADE
*15 *548 ¶ 1 The plaintiff, Advanced Physicians, S.C., sought to maintain a qui tam action against the defendants, Provena Glenwood Medical Imaging (Provena) and Future Diagnostics Group, LLC (FDG). After extensive motion practice, the circuit court denied the defendants' motions, culminating in an interlocutory appeal under Illinois Supreme Court Rule 308 (eff. Jan. 1, 2015). Four certified questions are presented in this appeal, including a question regarding whether the circuit court had subject matter jurisdiction and a question regarding whether Advanced Physicians constitutes an "interested"…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Vermont Agency of Natural Resources v. United States Ex Rel. StevensSupreme Court of the United States · 2000
- Belleville Toyota, Inc. v. Toyota Motor Sales, U.S.A., Inc.Illinois Supreme Court · 2002
- Rein v. David A. Noyes & Co.Illinois Supreme Court · 1996
- Hudson v. City of ChicagoIllinois Supreme Court · 2008
- People v. M.W.Illinois Supreme Court · 2009
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Advanced Physicians, S.C. v. Provena Glenwood Medical ImagingAppellate Court of Illinois · 2019