Legal Opinion

Shipman v. North Panola Consolidated School District

Mississippi Supreme Court

Decided August 4, 1994No. 94-CA-00063PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HAWKINS, Chief Justice,

for the Court:

In order to properly issue school bonds in Mississippi, a school district must comply with many state and federal laws. As we agree with the Chancery Court that the school district here did so comply, the holding of the Chancery Court validating the bonds is affirmed.

FACTS

In May of 1991, the Board of Trustees of the North Panola Consolidated School District (NPCSD) • passed a resolution which called for a special election concerning the issuance of $4,000,000 in school bonds. On July 9, 1991, this first school bond election was held with the proposed bond…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Perkins v. MatthewsSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  2. Culbreath v. JohnsonMississippi Supreme Court · 1983
  3. Mullins v. RatcliffMississippi Supreme Court · 1987
  4. Madden v. RhodesMississippi Supreme Court · 1993
  5. Bowers Window & Door Co. v. DearmanMississippi Supreme Court · 1989

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Colom Law Firm, LLC v. Board of TrusteesMississippi Supreme Court · 2009
  2. Cepr v. Board of Sup'rs of Lowndes CountyMississippi Supreme Court · 1999
  3. Citizens for Equal Propt Right v. Lowndes Cnty, Bd of SupvrsMississippi Supreme Court · 1995
  4. Shipman v. NORTH PANOLA CONSOL. SCHOOL DIST.Mississippi Supreme Court · 1994
  5. The Colom Law Firm, LLC v. Columbus Municipal School DistrictMississippi Supreme Court · 2008

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API